シリアの過激反体制派は、米国にそそのかされている ロシア専門家

国連安保理で欧州案が否決されたあと、米国の国連大使がシリア国民の名でロシアを批判したことに、たまげた(笑)。

米国に承認された西側の政策は、ロシアのみならず、インド、ブラジル、中国、アフリカからも反対されており、米欧以外は受け入れ不能である。

ロシアの政治分析者、ジャーナリストら24人が、シリア政府の招待で、問題のあった都市を見て回ったが、警察署など政府施設だけが破壊されていた。高級住宅地はただの一つも壊されていなかった。前の記事その23

従って、シリアのいわゆる革命勢力は、米国の立場にそそのかされていると断言することができる。そしてそのような勢力のなかに、人々を殺しているムスリム同胞団のようなテロ組織がいる。最近の例では、ムフティーの息子暗殺事件その2)がある。

「平和的デモ」の中で数百人の警官が殺されているから、平和的デモではないと断言できる。



So-called revolutionary forces in Syria inspired by US - expert
http://english.ruvr.ru/2011/10/08/58323974.html
Kudashkina Ekaterina
Oct 8, 2011 10:17 Moscow Time

Interview with Vyacheslav Matuzov, President of the Russian Society for the Promotion of Friendship and Business Ties with Arab Countries.

I've been talking to various analysts. Some of them were telling me that Russia's and China's use of the veto power in the UN is a large mistake because the Arab street and the Arab community tend to see it as a support for Mr. Assad's regime. Do you agree with this stance?

When I heard words that were pronounced by the American representative in the UN and the Security Council, Suzanne Rice, I was surprised by non-diplomatic language the American representative in the UN used, when she characterized the position of other colleagues in the UN Security Council. She used accusations and blaming. They cannot use such words because it's an independent position of the Russian Federation, independent from the American policy, independent from the American point of view.

And when it was repeated by the US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, on the same theme and Hillary Clinton even forgot she doesn't represent the opinion of the Syrian people, so she blamed the Russian Federation and China in the name of the Syrian people. I was astonished by such lack of diplomacy and political conscience in American diplomatic circles. It was not a diplomatic way to deal with other colleagues during the discussion of hard issues on the international level. I think that the US leadership feel themselves comfortable in the unilateral world. They consider that they give orders to other heads of state to get rid of their posts as the president of this or that state.

It is unacceptable from moral, political and from juridical point of view. It is unacceptable because the world opinion is not the American opinion. There are states that are against American policy towards Syria – India, China, the African continent, Brazil – so we can say that the western position, authorized by the Americans, is not acceptable for others. Dictate can be feared in Tunisia, in Libya but not in Russia. I think they make a big mistake using this language.

I see that Syria is a very complicate problem and Russia is not inclined to support opposition leaders not because they are against the Syrian leadership or the government but because any interference from outside into Syria's internal affairs is unacceptable from the legal point of view. It was absolutely clear from the words of Vitaly Churkin, Russia's representative in the UN – and I fully support his position, which was pronounced in his speech during the discussion.

Mr. Matuzov, how justified is the statement that this position of Russia and China undermined their positions in the Middle East?

I can say that it's undermining American geopolitical policy and I can say that this policy is to be regarded more thoroughly than the Syrian government's position. America proclaimed the necessity to reconstruct fully and completely the Middle East, to construct on the ruined states a new political-geographical map of a big and new Near East. We heard it from Condoleezza Rice in the days of George W. Bush. But neoconservative thinkers that was explained by Francis Fukuyama in his very well-known article about the neoconservative moment where he described the position of American neoconservative forces towards the Middle East and the US's international policy. I think those are the ideas that were plainly and very obviously explained in Democratic Realism, an article in The National Interest magazine.

I think it's absolutely unacceptable for any other political establishment in any country – in Russia, in China and even in developing countries of the third world. I think it's an egoistic, unilateral position that can be rejected on the level of the UN. I think it's the main point of contradictions between Russia and the US, which explains that neoconservative forces in the US are again facing the world after they lost presidential elections in the US, when Barack Obama was elected the president of the US and his speech in Cairo addressed the Islamic world.

Now, a new neoconservative wave in the American international policy is fixed on the so-called Arab revolutions, but they are known in the Arab world as coups d'état and maybe in the Islamic world too, because they have spread to such countries of the region as Iran and I don't exclude that even a member of the UN will in the end of this geopolitical operation of the US undergo the same restructuring of its territorial integrity.

As far as I understand you have been to Syria recently. What are your impressions?

There were 24 Russian political analysts, journalists and public figures that visited Syria on the invitation of the Syrian government. They gave us an opportunity to see some cities that were very widely known from world press – Hama, Homs, Latakia. We visited those cities and I can say that we didn't' notice any ruins in the streets. None of the houses were destroyed, only governmental centers were destroyed –the main police department and some others. All villas, all cottages were absolutely untouched.

So I can say that the so-called revolutionary forces in Syria are inspired by the position of the US and their declaration to support them, the demands to throw over the Syrian government. Among those forces we also see some terroristic organizations like the Muslim Brotherhood that were killing people. The latest case of their killing was (note: a son of) the great Mufti of Syria, who was killed by unknown people belonging to this organization.

I can say that hundreds of police officers and servicemen were killed by the so-called "peaceful demonstrators." It is not a peaceful demonstration and Russia understands that. When they called on the Syrian government to calm down and treat demonstrators in a peaceful way, the same thing was told to the opposition leaders, but the US rejected such kind of approach and demanded Russia to support their position and to throw over the legal Syrian government. It's unacceptable from any point of view – moral, legal and political.

ブログ気持玉

クリックして気持ちを伝えよう!

ログインしてクリックすれば、自分のブログへのリンクが付きます。

→ログインへ

なるほど(納得、参考になった、ヘー)
驚いた
面白い
ナイス
ガッツ(がんばれ!)
かわいい

気持玉数 : 0

この記事へのコメント

この記事へのトラックバック

  • プラダ バッグ

    Excerpt: シリアの過激反体制派は、米国にそそのかされている ロシア専門家 日々の感想/ウェブリブログ Weblog: プラダ バッグ racked: 2013-07-07 02:49